Subscribe with Bloglines        Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Senate requests $500k surety bond for HME

I'm sure you'll be hearing a lot more about this in the coming days and weeks and with good reason. It could knock a lot of small providers out of business.

Here's what AAHomecare reported this morning about the proposal:


ALEXANDRIA, Va. — A Senate bill introduced last week would impose a $500,000 surety bond requirement on providers of durable medical equipment (DME) under Medicare and would put thousands of small homecare companies out of business, says the American Association for Homecare.

A law passed in 1997 requires a $50,000 surety bond for DME providers as a deterrent to fraud and abuse. However, the federal government has never actually implemented the surety bond requirement for the DME sector. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has proposed that the amount increase to $65,000.

The bill introduced last week, S. 2603, called the “Medicare Fraud Prevention Act of 2008,” would increase the $50,000 surety bond requirement by a factor of 10. The bill would also increase civil and criminal fines for Medicare fraud and abuse. The bill is sponsored by Senators Mel Martinez (R-Fla.), John Cornyn (R-Texas), Norm Coleman (R-Minn.), Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), David Vitter (R-La.) and Jim DeMint (R-S.C.).

“The impact of a half-million dollar surety bond requirement would be devastating on law-abiding small providers,” said Tyler J. Wilson, president of the American Association for Homecare. “This provision would put a lot of home medical equipment providers out of business without fixing the fraud and abuse problem. No one is more concerned about getting criminals out of Medicare than the homecare sector, but this is clearly a case of throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Why would the government increase the surety bond by 1000 percent before it has even implemented the original amount?”

Insurance experts say a $500,000 surety bond would require that DME providers put up collateral to back the half-million-dollar bond, on top of the $10,000 to $20,000 cost of the bond.

Labels: , ,

Monday, January 21, 2008

VGM lobbies against the Scooter Store

The VGM Group sent a letter to AAHomecare last week, urging the association to remove the Scooter Store from its Rehab and Assistive Technology Council (RATC).

"All of us here (at VGM) can see that the Scooter Store has a different agenda than the rest of the industry," said Jerry Keiderling, president of VGM's US Rehab. "The industry needs to stand together. Multiple voices and agendas on the Hill don't work."

VGM's concern revolves around a letter the Scooter Store sent to some congressional offices in December. That letter appeared to support competitive bidding, although Scooter Store CEO Doug Harrison has since said that is not exactly the case.

Here is the letter VGM sent to AAhomecare:


Tuesday, January 15, 2008


To: AAHomecare RATC Executive Committee
Tim Pederson, RATC Chair
Seth Johnson, RATC Vice Chair
Michael Reinemer, AAH VP Communications & Policy


As a supporting member of AAHomecare and an active participant with the Rehab and Assistive Technology Council (RATC), I feel it imperative to voice my concerns on a certain matter relating to our rehab industry as a whole.

I’m sure that you have seen the announcement by HME News of the letter writing campaign to members of Congress being conducted by The Scooter Store organization. Their message is clear and concise. Their intent is to actively and aggressively promote Competitive Bidding nationwide and include both consumer power products along with complex rehab in the bid categories. This stance clearly conflicts with the efforts of the RATC and all other industry organizations in our efforts to exempt rehab from the bidding process.

I find it difficult to believe that having representatives of The Scooter Store within the RATC can have anything other than a negative effect on our efforts to support the industry. I would therefore ask you to reconsider the involvement of The Scooter Store representatives on this council. We need one voice carrying a single and positive message to Capital Hill. Our opposing agendas will only result in fragmented and divided efforts, leaving policy makers with a dull view of our intent.

I have attached copies of both the HME News article and a copy of a letter written by Mr. Mark Leita of The Scooter Store directed to members of Congress. Please take this under serious consideration.

I will await your reply.

Sincerely,

Jerry Keiderling
President
U.S. Rehab

Labels: , ,