Skip to Content

The competitive bidding chronicles

The competitive bidding chronicles

It all started with an e-mail from one of our readers. It went something like this: Can't HME News help the industry collect and report on problems that will occur as a result of competitive bidding? The reader's idea: Identify a provider in each of the nine competitive bidding areas (CBAs) and check-in with that provider on a regular basis to see how the program unfolds.

It's a good idea, but it's a little more than three editors at HME News can handle. After all, competitive bidding isn't the only issue providers are facing, especially providers who aren't in the first nine CBAs. For them, more immediate concerns include audits and the elimination of the first-month purchase option for standard power wheelchairs.

Still, the idea stuck with us. Considering that competitive bidding is the biggest thing to hit the industry in, oh, at least a decade, maybe ever, we knew we had to step up our game. In addition to writing stories on competitive bidding like those featured in the February issue--and there are about a half-dozen, including three on the front page--we wanted, and knew we needed, to do more.

Hence, the first installment of “The competitive bidding chronicles” in the Edit Spread of the February issue.

Each month, Contributing Editor Jennifer Keirn will check in with providers Sam Jarczynski, who is a contract supplier for sleep products in the Orlando CBA; and John Reed, who is not a contract supplier in the Cincinnati CBA. Keirn's goal: To provide a first-person account of the impact of competitive bidding on their businesses, referral sources and patients.

For this first installment, Keirn interviewed Jarczynski and Reed just as competitive bidding was getting up and running in January, and both providers were full of uncertainty. Jarczynski may be a contract supplier, but he wasn't actively marketing his services to referral sources because he doesn't want to waste his time and money if the program is, once again, stalled or repealed.

As a non-contract supplier, Reed still doesn't know whether to subcontract, acquire a contract supplier or diversify his product lines, and was placing his bets on competitive bidding, in its current form, not lasting more than several weeks.

I'm sure after reading this first installment, you'll want more. For Jarczynski: Without any marketing, is he getting any calls from referral sources? If so, do referral sources seem educated about the program and did he find that he could provide reasonable products and services at the competitive bidding price? Has he changed his mind about his wait-and-see approach?

For Reed: How's grandfathering going? Has he decided yet whether to subcontract, make an acquisition or diversify his product lines? What's it been like, living without 40% of his business (Medicare) and making do with one-third fewer employees?

Turn to upcoming issues to find out.

Whatever happens with competitive bidding, these accounts will provide a record, something that providers can,  in a few years, re-read and say, “Remember when…” Reed told me, it's like when you have a child and as he or she gets older, you always look back and wish you had taken more pictures and documented more milestones. That's why he agreed to participate; he wants a record.

For that, we should all thank Reed and Jarczynski not only for participating but also for being so forthcoming.

Liz Beaulieu


To comment on this post, please log in to your account or set up an account now.